Gujarat High Court
CR.MA/23742/2025 of SALMANBHAI YAKUBBHAI VAHORA Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 6 January 2026
06/01/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 23742 of 2025 In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION/43605/2025 ================================================= SALMANBHAI YAKUBBHAI VAHORA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
R/CR.MA/23742/2025 ORDER DATED: 06/01/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION
OF DELAY) NO. 23742 of 2025
In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION/43605/2025
=================================================
SALMANBHAI YAKUBBHAI VAHORA
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
=================================================
Appearance:
DR. HIREN S SOMAIYA(8031) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR JOHNSEY P MACWAN(5498) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MR UTKARSH SHARMA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
=================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL
Date : 06/01/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. By this application under section 5 of the Limitation Act, the applicant seeks condonation of delay of 32 days caused in filing the captioned revision application.
2. Heard, the learned advocates for the respective parties present. 2.1 The learned advocate for the applicant has taken this Court through the averments made in this application and stated that in
R/CR.MA/23742/2025 ORDER DATED: 06/01/2026 view of sufficient cause is shown for condonation of delay in filing the revision application, he urged to allow this application, to which, the learned advocate for the respondent No. 2 has strongly opposed stating that no cause, much less, sufficient cause is shown to condone the delay and accordingly, he prayed to reject this application.
3. Having heard and considering the averments made in the memorandum of application, the Court is of the view that the delay that has occasioned in preferring the revision application has been sufficiently explained. The application, therefore, succeeds and is, accordingly, allowed. The delay caused in filing the revision application is hereby condoned. Rule is made absolute accordingly. [ P. M. Raval, J. ] hiren/58tss6126
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: HIREN VIRENDRABHAI MER(HC00351), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 06/01/2026 17:04:14