Gujarat High Court
CR.MA/18851/2025 of NITINBHAI JETHABHAI MAKWANA Vs VANITABEN BABUBHAI PARMAR on 9 December 2025
09/12/2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 18851 of 2025 In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 34959 of 2025 ========================================================== NITINBHAI JETHABHAI MAKWANA Versus VANITABEN BABUBHAI
R/CR.MA/18851/2025 ORDER DATED: 09/12/2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO.
18851 of 2025
In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 34959 of 2025
==========================================================
NITINBHAI JETHABHAI MAKWANA
Versus
VANITABEN BABUBHAI PARMAR & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR MANGAL V GADHAVI(11922) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
HCLS COMMITTEE(4998) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MS TEJAL K SHAH(2719) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s) No. 2
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL
Date : 09/12/2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. By this application under section 5 of the Limitation Act, the applicant seeks condonation of delay of 97 days caused in filing the captioned revision application.
2. Ld. Advocate Ms. Tejal K Shah for Respondent No. 1 has opposed the said application and argued to disposed of the said application for condonation of delay.
3. Rule, returnable forthwith. Learned advocate for the respondent waive service / Learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service for the respondent – State.
R/CR.MA/18851/2025 ORDER DATED: 09/12/2025
4. Heard, the learned advocates for the respective parties present.
5. Having heard and considering the averments made in the memorandum of application, the Court is of the view that the delay that has occasioned in preferring the revision application has been sufficiently explained. The application, therefore, succeeds and is, accordingly, allowed. The delay caused in filing the revision application is hereby condoned. Rule is made absolute accordingly.
6. At the request of Ld. Advocates for the parties, the main matter to be placed before the ensuing Lok Adalat on 13.12.2025. (P. M. RAVAL, J) MMP
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: MAHENDRA MOHANBHAI PUROHIT(HCD0074), ENGLISH STENOGRAPHER GRADE TWO CLASS TWO, at High Court of Gujarat on 09/12/2025 17:41:54