Gujarat High Court

CA/1471/2024 of THE STATE OF GUJARAT Vs LABHUBEN RAGHAVBHAI BALDHA on 8 December 2025

Cites 1, Cited by 0

08/12/2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 1471 of 2024 In F/FIRST APPEAL NO. 8638 of 2024 ========================================================== THE STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. Versus LABHUBEN RAGHAVBHAI BALDHA & ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 1471 of

In F/FIRST APPEAL NO. 8638 of 2024

==========================================================

THE STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

Versus

LABHUBEN RAGHAVBHAI BALDHA & ORS.

==========================================================

Appearance:

MR SHIVAM DIXIT, ASST.GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the Applicant(s) No.

1,2

FRESH NOTICE SERVED(4512) for the Respondent(s) No. 4

NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 2

NOTICE UNSERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 3

UNSERVED EXPIRED (N) for the Respondent(s) No. 1

==========================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE

and

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J. L. ODEDRA

Date : 08/12/2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

1

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE)

1. This application is filed by the applicants under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay of 652 days in preferring the First Appeal (Filing) No.8638 of 2024.

2. Learned advocate has drawn attention of this Court to the contents of para-2 to 5 of the application, wherein it stated that the learned 2nd Senior Civil Judge, Junagadh pronounced the judgement and award on 16.02.2022 and, therefore, pursuant to the said judgement and award, an application was preferred on 12.07.2022 by the concerned District Government Pleader to obtain the certified copy of the judgement and award along with requisite Court Fees was also paid. Intimation was received by the District Government Pleader from the Registry of the Reference Court and the certified copy was preferred and it was ready for delivery. The District Government Pleader duly received all the certified copy of the judgement and award on 12.07.2022. On receipt of the same, the District Government Pleader forwarded the opinion on 29.09.2022 with respect to the content of the award to prefer an appeal before this Court. Thus, the proposal to prefer appeal along with the opinion of the District Government Pleader was sent to Acquisition Authority on 04.10.2022 with an opinion to file Appeal. The proposal was sent to Executive Engineer, Rajkot Irrigation Project Circle Office, Rajkot with an opinion to file Appeal on 07.11.2022. On 16.06.2023, the Legal Department, Gandhinagar in turn forwarded the proposal and details demonstrating requisite sanctions obtained from all the departments. On 09.08.2023, office of the Executive Engineer Irrigation Department, Junagadh sent entire set of papers to the office of the Government Pleader, High Court of Gujarat to file Appeal. On the basis of the details forwarded, draft of Appeal was prepared and was sent for approval to the Legal Department. Thereafter, the Appeal was filed before this Court.

3. Therefore, learned advocate has drawn attention of this Court to the reasons for which delay has occurred.

4. Considering the aforesaid, particularly, period of 652 days of delay, the Court is of the view that considering the facts involved in the case, delay cannot be treated as inordinate.

6. Considering the submissions and the contents of the para mentioned hereinabove, the delay is also explained sufficiently.

7. A reference in this regard may be made to the judgment of the Supreme Court in case of Sheo Raj Singh (Deceased) through Legal Representatives and others vs/. Union of India and Another, reported in, (2023) 10 SCC 531, wherein the term “Sufficient Cause” was interpreted and the approach of Courts while deciding application for condonation of delay was discussed.

8. In view of the aforesaid, the application is allowed. The delay of 652 days caused in preferring the First Appeal (Filing) No.8638 of 2024 is hereby condoned. Registry is directed to list the main appeal in due course. (A.Y. KOGJE, J) (J. L. ODEDRA, J) SUDHIR

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judges. Digitally signed by: SUDHIR ACHUTHAN EZHUTHASSAN(HC00192), GOV, at High Court of Gujarat on 16/12/2025 17:48:39

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead