Gujarat High Court

CR.MA/19407/2025 of RAJESHBHAI SOMABHAI HATHIYA Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 14 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

14/11/2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 19407 of 2025 In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 37566 of 2025 ========================================================== RAJESHBHAI SOMABHAI HATHIYA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT

R/CR.MA/19407/2025 ORDER DATED: 14/11/2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO.

19407 of 2025

In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 37566 of 2025

==========================================================

RAJESHBHAI SOMABHAI HATHIYA

Versus

STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

==========================================================

Appearance:

MR MANGAL V GADHAVI(11922) for the Applicant(s) No. 1

MR DIVYA P BHATT(12898) for the Respondent(s) No. 2

MR. UTKARSH SHARMA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1

==========================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL

Date : 14/11/2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

Rule xed forthwith. Learned advocate Mr. Divya P. Bhatt waives service of rule on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of respondent - State.

1. By this application, the applicant has prayed for condonation of delay of 86 days in preferring Criminal Revision Application.

2. Heard the learned Advocates for the parties. The respondent No.2 – complainant – Upendrasinh Devisinh Jadeja has also remained present before this Court and has stated that he has no objection if the delay is condoned as the matter is settled between the parties.

3. Having heard learned Advocates for the respective

R/CR.MA/19407/2025 ORDER DATED: 14/11/2025 parties and considering the averments made in the application and no objection of complainant, delay in preferring the Criminal Revision Application deserves to be condoned and is hereby condoned.

4. Accordingly, the present application is allowed in above terms. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. (P. M. RAVAL, J) NITIN MAKWANA

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: NITIN INDRAVADAN MAKWANA(HCW0110), ENGLISH STENOGRAPHER GRADE I, at High Court of Gujarat on 14/11/2025 18:11:07

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead