Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./1849/2026 of MOHINDER SINGH Vs THE HRTC AND OTHERS on 8 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Ex. Pet. No.1849 of 2026 Decided on: 8th October, 2026 Mohinder Singh ....Petitioner versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another. ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge. Whether approved for
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:44131
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
Ex. Pet. No.1849 of 2026
Decided on: 8th October, 2026
Mohinder Singh
....Petitioner
versus
Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another.
...Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner: Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Virender Singh Kanwar, Advocate.
Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel representing the respondents has produced a copy of office order dated 03.09.2026 passed by the Managing Director, Himachal Road Transport Corporation, Shimla-171003, which is taken on record.
2. A perusal of the aforesaid office order reveals that the representation made by the petitioner has been considered and rejected.
3. This Court while disposing of CWP No.5691 of 2026, titled, Mohinder Singh vs. Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another on 12.05.2026 had directed the 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2026:HHC:44131 2
authority concerned to decide the representation, if made by the petitioner, by passing a speaking order. Since the Managing Director of the respondent-Corporation has passed a speaking order, the mandate contained in the judgment sought to be executed has duly been complied with and the execution petition is disposed of as having been fully satisfied. However, the petitioner is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) 8th October, 2026
Judge (naveen)