Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./2418/2026 of SUNITA THAKUR Vs Himachal Road Transport Corporation on 8 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 2418 of 2026 Date of Decision: 08.10.2026 _______________________________________________________ Sunita Thakur …….Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation & others … Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No. 2418 of 2026 Date of Decision: 08.10.2026 _______________________________________________________ Sunita Thakur
…….Petitioner
Versus
Himachal Road Transport Corporation & others … Respondents ______________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):
While placing on record communication dated 22.09.2026, issued under the signatures of Dy. Divisional Manager, HRTC, Taradevi Unit, Mr. Deepak Sharma, learned counsel representing the respondents, states that the mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, stands duly complied with.
2. Having carefully perused the aforesaid communication, which is taken on record, this Court finds that DCRG and leave encashment to the tune of Rs. 12, 83, 928 and Rs. 8,70,460 alongwith interest of Rs. 70,429 and Rs. 48,257, respectively stand paid to petitioner and as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, same is disposed of. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law qua the surviving grievance, if any.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge October 08,2026 (shankar)
1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?