Himachal Pradesh High Court

EX.P./2403/2026 of SANJAY KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 8 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 2403 of 2026 Date of Decision: 08.10.2026 _______________________________________________________ Sanjay Kumar …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Execution Petition No. 2403 of 2026 Date of Decision: 08.10.2026 _______________________________________________________ Sanjay Kumar

…….Petitioner

Versus

State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents ______________________________________________________

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1

For the Petitioner: Mr. Vivek Thakur, Advocate.

For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):

Learned Additional Advocate General fairly states that needful in the case of the petitioner in terms of judgment passed by Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 2004 of 2017 titlted Taj Mohammad and others vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, shall be done within a period of four months, as has been undertaken before the Hon'ble Apex Court.

2. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of, with a direction to the respondents to ensure that needful in terms of the judgment, sought to be executed, is done expeditiously, preferably within a period for months, failing which, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present proceedings revived, so that appropriate action, in 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2 accordance with law, is taken towards implementation of the judgment/ order, sought to be executed in the instant proceedings.

(Sandeep Sharma),

Judge October 08,2026 (shankar)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead