Himachal Pradesh High Court

Cr.Rev.(FC)/5/2026 of Shubham Vs Rakhi Sharma and others on 8 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Criminal Revision (FC) No.5 of 2026 Decided on: 08.10.2026 Sh. Shubham Shrma … Petitioner Versus Smt. Rakhi Sharma & others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Yogesh Jaswal, Judge.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

2026:HHC:44045 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Criminal Revision (FC) No.5 of 2026 Decided on: 08.10.2026 Sh. Shubham Shrma … Petitioner Versus Smt. Rakhi Sharma & others … Respondents

Coram

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Yogesh Jaswal, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________

_

For the petitioner: Ms. Bhavya Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Varun Thakur, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) By way of this petition, the petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for the following relief:- “It is therefore respectfully prayed that keeping in view the facts and circumstances narrated above the petition of the Petitioner may kindly be allowed and the order dated 13.11.2025 passed by the Ld. Principal Judge, Family Court, Nahan, District Sirmaur, H.P passed in case No. 291 of 2025 in case titled as Rakhi Sharma versus Shubham Sharma, whereby, the petition filed by the respondent was allowed and interim maintenance of Rs 10;000/- per month is granted to the respondent with the prayer to set aside the same in the interest of justice.”

2. After hearing the learned Counsel for the parties, we dispose of this petition with the observation that the main petition itself, which has been preferred by the respondents herein, shall be decide by the learned Court below concerned as expeditiously as possible and preferably by 31.05.2027 in accordance with law. The

Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2026:HHC:44045 issue which has been raised by the petitioner herein, can be raised by the petitioners before the learned Court below during the course of hearing of the main petition. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.

(Ajay Mohan Goel)

Judge (Yogesh Jaswal) Judge

October 08, 2026 (Rishi)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead