Himachal Pradesh High Court
CMP/23712/2026 of USHA KUMARI Vs RAKESH KANWAR AND OTHERS on 8 October 2026
Versus RAKESH KANWAR AND OTHERS CMP-23712 of 2026 in COPC - 706 of 2026 08.10.2026 Present: Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner. Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
USHA KUMARI Versus RAKESH KANWAR AND OTHERS
CMP-23712 of 2026 in
COPC - 706 of 2026
08.10.2026 Present: Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner.
Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the non-applicant/respondent-State.
While placing on record communication dated 07.10.2026 issued under the signature of Director, School Education, enclosing therewith communication dated 07.10.2026 addressed to the Director of School Education, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla, Mr. Ravi Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, states that mandate contained in the judgment alleged to have been violated stands complied with.
Having carefully perused aforesaid documents, which are taken on record, vis-à-vis mandate contained in the judgment alleged to have been violated, this Court finds merit in the contention of learned Deputy Advocate General. As per aforesaid communications, budget has been allocated to the Block Elementary Education Officer, Jhandutta and bill has been prepared vide Bill No. 100161 dated 03.10.2026 and submitted to the Sub-Treasury Office, Jhandutta, District Bilaspur, for further disbursement to the petitioner.
In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the
same are closed with a direction to the Sub-Treasury Office, Jhandutta, to disburse the amount to the petitioner expeditiously, preferably within a period of two weeks from today, failing which, respondents would aggravate the contempt and petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of the present proceedings so that appropriate action, in accordance with law, is taken against the erring officials.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge
October 08, 2026
(Sunil)