Himachal Pradesh High Court
Cr.Rev.(FC)/72/2025 of RAJEEV KUMAR Vs KRISHNA DEVI on 8 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.Rev.(FC) No. 72 of 2025 Date of decision: 08.10.2026 Rajeev Kumar …..Petitioner Versus Krishna Devi …..Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Yogesh Jaswal, Judge.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:43864
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.Rev.(FC) No. 72 of 2025 Date of decision: 08.10.2026 Rajeev Kumar …..Petitioner
Versus Krishna Devi …..Respondent
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Yogesh Jaswal, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhinav Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondent : Ms. Shivani Tegta, Legal Aid Counsel. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following relief:- “That the present petition may kindly be allowed with costs throughout and the order dated 06.10.2025 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Hamirpur, H.P. in Cr.M.A No.103/2025 (in petition under Section 144 BNSS, No.14 of 2025), CIS Registration No.103/2025, CNR No.HPHA-01-000323-2025 may kindly be quashed and set- aside and the application filed by the respondent for grant of interim maintenance may kindly be dismissed with costs through in the interest of justice”
2. Having heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, as also Ms. Shivani Tegta, learned Legal Aid Counsel, for the respondent, we are of the considered view that the interest of justice 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?Yes
2026:HHC:43864 would be served in case the petition is disposed of by observing that the main petition, which is pending before the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Hamirpur, H.P., be decided expeditiously.
3. Accordingly, without making any observation on the merits of the issues involved, the petition is disposed of by directing the learned Court below to make an endeavour to decide the main petition itself on or before 31.03.2027. The interim order passed by the Court on 24.11.2025 is modified to the extent that henceforth, i.e. from the month of October, 2026, as upto the adjudication of the application, the petitioner shall pay an amount of 7,500/- per month ₹7,500/- per month to the mother. This, of course, shall be subject to the final outcome of the main case. All the pleas which have been raised by the petitioner in the present case can be raised by the petitioner before the learned Court below in the course of adjudication of the main petition. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge (Yogesh Jaswal) Judge
08th October, 2026. (yogesh)