Himachal Pradesh High Court
COPC/1261/2026 of ONKAR SINGH Vs RAKESH KANWAR AND ANOTHER on 8 October 2026
Citation No. ( 2026:HHC:43859 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.1261 of 2026 Date of decision: 08.10.2026 Onkar Singh ….Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & another ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:HHC:43859 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.1261 of 2026 Date of decision: 08.10.2026 Onkar Singh ….Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & another ….Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on record communication dated 07.10.2026, wherein, it has been stated that the pay of the petitioner has been re-fixed by the Principal, GSSS, Darini, District Kangra, vide office order dated 07.10.2026. It is has further been stated that after re-fixation of pay, the total arrears admissible to the petitioner work out to Rs.50,915- (Rupees Fifty Thousands Nine Hundred Fifteen only) and budget to meet out first installment of arrear amounting to Rs.16971/-, has been provided to the concerned treasury vide sanction letter dated 07.10.2026.
2. Therefore, in view of the above, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge October, 08, 2026
(reena)
Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement?