Himachal Pradesh High Court
CMPMO/588/2024 of RUKAIYA Vs SADIK AND OTHERS on 7 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CMPMO No. 588/2024 Decided on: 07.10.2026 Rukaiya ….Petitioner Versus Sadik & ors. …Respondents ________________________________________________________________ Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:44128 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CMPMO No. 588/2024
Decided on: 07.10.2026
Rukaiya
….Petitioner
Versus
Sadik & ors.
…Respondents ________________________________________________________________
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Servedaman Rathore, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Desh Raj Thakur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anmol Sharma, Advocate.
Romesh Verma, Judge (oral)
It is heartening to note that with intervention of the learned Mediator, Ms. Ritta Goswami, Senior Advocate, the matter has been compromised inter se the parties. The compromise deed, which is part and parcel of the mediation file, is taken on record.
In view of above, the instant petition is disposed of in terms of the compromise, as effected between the parties with direction to the parties that they shall remain bound by the terms and conditions of the compromise and 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
2
in the event of violation of the same on the part of any of the parties, they shall be liable to be punished under the Contempt of Courts Act. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(Romesh Verma) 07th October, 2026
Judge (pankaj)