Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./860/2026 of RAMESH CHAND Vs STATE OF HP AND ORS on 7 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.860 of 2026 Decided on: 07.10.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Ramesh Chand ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.860 of 2026 Decided on: 07.10.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Ramesh Chand
...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Vishal Singh Thakur and Mr. Jai Dev Thakur, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Amit Kumar Chaudhary, Deputy Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
, Judge
(Oral)
Learned Deputy Advocate General has produced instructions dated 05.10.2026 along with copy of office order dated 01.10.2026, passed by Director Ayush, Himachal Pradesh, which are taken on record.
2. A perusal of the aforesaid office order dated 01.10.2026 reveals that the services of the petitioner have been regularized after completion of 08 years of service from the date of his initial appointment on notional basis and further he has been held entitled for back wages along with calculated arrears.
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
3. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 23.12.2025, passed in CWP No.1543 of 2022, titled, Sukh Ram and others vs. State of H.P. and others, has been complied with, thereby regularizing the services of the petitioner, who was one of the petitioners in the writ petition, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present execution petition and the same is closed. However, it is made clear that in case the arrears are not released in favour of the petitioner, within eight weeks from today, strictly in terms of the directions contained in the judgment, which is sought to be executed, he shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the execution petition.
4. Accordingly, the execution petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
th October
, 2026
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (Anurag) Judge