Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./1587/2025 of GIAN CHAND Vs HPTDCL AND ANOTHER on 7 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 1587 of 2025 Date of Decision: 07.10.2026 _______________________________________________________ Gian Chand …….Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation & another … Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No. 1587 of 2025 Date of Decision: 07.10.2026 _______________________________________________________ Gian Chand
…….Petitioner
Versus
Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation & another
… Respondents ______________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Rohit, Advocate vice Mr. Praveen
Chauhan, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Harmender Singh, Advocate vice Mr. Shivank Singh Panta, Advocate. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):
While placing on record communication dated 27.07.2026, issued under the signatures of Joint Controller, HPF & AS, HPTDC, Dharamshala, learned counsel representing the respondents states that all the arrears, except the arrears of revised pay scale, have been paid/released to the petitioner. He states that arrears of revised pay scale shall be governed by the outcome of the review petition filed in Tulsi Ram's case.
2. Having perused the aforesaid communication, this Court finds that substantial amount on account of gratuity and leave encashment stand paid and now only arrears on account of revised pay scale remain to be released and as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, same is disposed 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
of, reserving liberty to the petitioner to file fresh execution petition after disposal of Tulsi Ram's case, if need so arises. Ordered accordingly.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge October 07,2026 (shankar)