Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./1690/2026 of SUKH RAM Vs STATE OF HP AND ORS on 7 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1690 of 2026 Decided on: 07.10.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Sukh Ram and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1690 of 2026 Decided on: 07.10.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Sukh Ram and others
...Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioners: Mr. Jai Dev Thakur and Mr. Vishal Singh Thakur, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Amit Kumar Chaudhary, Deputy Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
, Judge
(Oral)
While passing the office order dated 01.10.2026, which has been placed on record in Execution Petition No.860 of 2026, the mandate contained in the judgment dated 23.12.2025, passed in CWP No.1543 of 2022, titled, Sukh Ram and others vs. State of H.P. and others, has been complied with.
2. Since the judgment, which is sought to be executed, has been complied with, except the arrears, which remain to be paid to the petitioners, the proceedings in the present execution petition are closed. However, in
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
case the arrears are not released in favour of the petitioners, within eight weeks from today, strictly in terms of the directions contained in the judgment, which is sought to be executed, they shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the execution petition.
3. Accordingly, the execution petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
th October
, 2026
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (Anurag) Judge