Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.PT/71/2026 of ANITA NAGRAIK Vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 7 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 71 of 2026 Date of Decision: 07.10.2026 _______________________________________________________ Smt. Anita Nagraik …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No. 71 of 2026 Date of Decision: 07.10.2026 _______________________________________________________ Smt. Anita Nagraik
…….Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents ______________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ashir Kaith, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondent- State.
Mr. Rajesh Kosh, Advocate, for respondent No.4. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):
While placing on record communication dated 06.10.2026, issued under the signatures of Director of School Education, Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, states that necessary budget has been provided to the concerned Principal for further distribution to the petitioner on 05.10.2026. He further states that only one installment remains to be paid, which shall be paid expeditiously.
2. Having perused aforesaid communication, which is taken on record, there appears to be merit in the contention of learned Additional Advocate General and as such, nothing remains to be 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, same is disposed of, with a direction to the respondents to ensure that last installment of Rs. 6,09,252/-, if not already released, is released in favour of the petitioner within a period of three weeks, failing which, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present proceedings revived, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law, is taken towards implementation of the judgment/ order, sought to be executed in the instant proceedings
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge October 07,2026 (shankar)