Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./1400/2026 of BALDEV SINGH Vs HPSEB AND ANOTHER on 7 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1400 of 2026 Decided on: 07.10.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Baldev Singh ...Petitioner Versus The Himachal Pradesh Electricity Board and another ...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1400 of 2026 Decided on: 07.10.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Baldev Singh
...Petitioner Versus The Himachal Pradesh Electricity Board and another
...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Nishant Khidtta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
, Judge
(Oral)
Learned counsel for the respondents has produced instructions dated 09.09.2026 and copy of memorandum dated 08.09.2026, issued by the Under Secretary (NGE) HPSEBL, Vidyut Bhawan, Shimla-4, which are taken on record.
2. A perusal of the aforesaid instructions dated 09.09.2026 reveals that the petitioner has been offered appointment as Peon on daily wage basis vide office appointment memorandum dated 08.09.2026.
3. This Court while disposing of the writ petition on 28.11.2025 had directed the respondents to provide
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
compassionate appointment to the petitioner forthwith. Though the petitioner has not been offered appointment forthwith and further the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner ought to have been offered appointment on regular basis instead of daily wage basis but this Court will not go into that question.
4. Since the petitioner has now been offered the appointment, the present execution petition is closed. However, the petitioner, if still aggrieved, may take appropriate remedy against the memorandum dated 08.09.2026, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
th October
, 2026
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (Anurag) Judge