Himachal Pradesh High Court
COPC/1353/2026 of PREM LATA NEGI Vs M.SUDHA DEVI AND OTHERS on 6 October 2026
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 1353 of 2026 Decided on: 06.10.2026 ________________________________________________ Prem Lata Negi ....Petitioner Versus Ms. Sudha Devi & Ors. …Respondents _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1 ( 2026:HHC:43221 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No. 1353 of 2026
Decided on: 06.10.2026 ________________________________________________ Prem Lata Negi ....Petitioner Versus
Ms. Sudha Devi & Ors. …Respondents _
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 & 2. Mr. Jitender Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Manohal Lal Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 3. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Learned Deputy Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 03.10.2026, wherein, it has been stated that representation of the present petitioner has been kept pending by the respondent-department till the final outcome/decision in LPA No. 295/2026 or till finality of the judgment dated 21.03.2024 passed by this Court in all the 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 ( 2026:HHC:43221 ) cases, under intimation to the respective petitioners by way of issuing separate order.
2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, at this stage, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the same is closed.
3. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to revive the present contempt petition, if occasion arises to do so. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
6th October, 2026 Judge (raman)