Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./1923/2026 of SUSHMA KUMARI Vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 6 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Ex. Pet. No.1923 of 2026 Decided on: 6th October, 2026 Sushma Kumari ....Petitioner versus State of H.P. and others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:43470
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
Ex. Pet. No.1923 of 2026
Decided on: 6th October, 2026
Sushma Kumari
....Petitioner
versus
State of H.P. and others
...Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner: Mr. Mandeep Chandel, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Amit Kumar Chaudhary, Deputy Advocate General.
Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral)
Learned Deputy Advocate General has produced instructions dated 01.10.2026 and copy of office order dated 25.09.2026 passed by the Director, Directorate of School Education, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-171001. The same are taken on record.
2. A perusal of aforesaid order reveals that as per the representation made by the petitioner, her case has been examined and it has been found that she was appointed as TGT on 21.12.2020 on contract basis and regularized on 03.06.2023 and since she has been appointed before 03.01.2022 on contract basis, her case is similarly situate to 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2026:HHC:43470 2
Mohit Sharma's case. The petitioner has been allowed higher pay scale in the concerned level of pay matrix after completion of two years regular service, subject to the final outcome of LPA filed by the State in Mohit Sharma's case. The DDO concerned has been directed to fix the pay of petitioner and release the arrear.
3. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 24.03.2026 passed by this Court in CWP No.3553/2026, titled, Sushma Kumari vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, has been complied with, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present execution petition and the same is closed. However, in case the arrears are not released in favour of the petitioner within eight weeks from today, she shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the execution petition.
4. The execution petition is accordingly disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any.
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) 6th October, 2026
Judge (naveen)