Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./1966/2026 of SUNITA DEVI Vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 6 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Ex. Pet. No.1966 of 2026 Decided on: 6th October, 2026 Sunita Devi ....Petitioner versus State of H.P. and others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:43497
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
Ex. Pet. No.1966 of 2026
Decided on: 6th October, 2026
Sunita Devi
....Petitioner
versus
State of H.P. and others
...Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner: Mr. Rajesh Verma, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Amit Kumar Chaudhary, Deputy Advocate General.
Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral)
Learned Deputy Advocate General has produced instructions dated 03.10.2026 issued by the Director, Directorate of School Education, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-1 and copy of order dated 03.10.2026 passed by the Deputy Director of School Education (Elementary), Solan, District Solan, H.P., which are taken on record.
2. A perusal of the aforesaid order reveals that the claim of the petitioner for grant of benefit of higher pay stage on completion of two years of regular service has been accepted, subject to verification of her individual service record and also subject to the final outcome of the pending/
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2026:HHC:43497 2
further legal proceedings arising out of CWP No.4830 of 2023 and any other legal remedy available to the Department.
3. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 12.05.2026 passed by this Court in CWP No.6091/2026, titled, Sunita Devi vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, has been complied with and the necessary orders have been passed, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present execution petition and the same is closed. However, in case the arrears are not released in favour of the petitioner within eight weeks from today, she shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the execution petition.
4. The execution petition is accordingly disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any.
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) 6th October, 2026
Judge (naveen)