Himachal Pradesh High Court
CRMPM/1951/2026 of BUDHI SINGH Vs STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER on 6 October 2026
State of H.P. & anr. Cr. MP (M) No. 1951 of 2026 6.10.2026 Present: Mr. Mandeep Chandel, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.1-State. Mr. Dikken Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Power of Attorney on behalf of respondent No.2 has
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Budhi Singh vs. State of H.P. & anr. Cr. MP (M) No. 1951 of 2026 6.10.2026 Present: Mr. Mandeep Chandel, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.1-State. Mr. Dikken Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Power of Attorney on behalf of respondent No.2 has been filed. Taken on record. Cr.MP(M) No. 1951 of 2026 Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submitted that he has no objection of allowing the application for condonation of delay. In view of the above, the present application is allowed and the delay in filing the revision is ordered to be condoned. Application stands disposed of. Cr. Revision (ST) No. 9052 of 2026 and Cr.MP (ST) No. 9053 of 2026 Vide separate order passed in the application Cr.MP(M) No. 1951 of 2026, the delay in filing the revision has been condoned; the revision as well as the application be registered. Notice. Mr. Ajit Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Dikken Kumar, learned counsel appear and waive service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2, respectively.
Copy(ies) of the petition be supplied to the learned counsel for the respective respondents. Learned counsel for respondent No.2, under instructions, has submitted that matter has been compromised between the parties. In view thereof, petitioner is directed to deposit 7.5% of the cheque amount before Member, Secretary, H.P. Legal Services Authority, Kasumpti, Shimla, as per the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sanjabij Tari vs. Kishore S. Brocar and another (2025) SCC Online SC 2069 and list the matter thereafter. (Rakesh Kainthla)
Judge
6th October, 2026 (Chander)