Himachal Pradesh High Court

EX.P./1673/2026 of MITTER DEV Vs H.P. Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1673 of 2026 Decided on: 06 th October, 2026 ___________________________________________________________________ Mitter Dev ....Petitioner Versus HPTDC Limited ...Respondent

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

2026:HHC:43538

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1673

of 2026

Decided on: 06

th October, 2026

___________________________________________________________________ Mitter Dev ....Petitioner Versus HPTDC Limited

...Respondent _____________________________________________________________________

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Tek Chand Sharma and Mr. Avnish Mandhotra, Advocates. For the respondent: Mr. Shivank Singh Panta, Advocate. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral)

Learned counsel representing the respondent has produced a computation sheet, which is taken on record.

2. A perusal of the same reveals that the petitioner has been paid the amount of gratuity, leave encashment and interest on the amount(s) of gratuity and leave encashment. Further, the petitioner has also been paid the entire amount of ADAs, IR and new pay scale.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that now only interest on the revised gratuity and revised leave 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

encashment remains to be paid to the petitioner.

4. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 25.06.2025, passed in CWP No.1075 of 2024, titled, Shri Mitter Dev vs. Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation Limited, has substantially been complied with, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present execution petition and the same is closed. However, in case the interest on the revised gratuity as well as on revised leave encashment is not paid to the petitioner within four weeks from today, he shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the present execution petition. In case the petitioner still has any grievance, he may avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law.

5. The execution petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

th October, 2026

( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (ankit) Judge

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead