Himachal Pradesh High Court

CMP/24402/2026 of SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Vs PUSHPA DEVI on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GIC Ltd. Vs. Pushpa Devi & Ors. CMPs No. 24402 & 24403/2026 in FAO No. 207/2014 06.10.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the non- applicant/appellant. Mr. Ashok K. Verma, Advocate, for applicants/respondents No. 2 & 3. CMP No. 24402/2026 The present application under

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Shriram GIC Ltd. Vs. Pushpa Devi & Ors. CMPs No. 24402 & 24403/2026 in FAO No. 207/2014 06.10.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the non- applicant/appellant. Mr. Ashok K. Verma, Advocate, for applicants/respondents No. 2 & 3. CMP No. 24402/2026

The present application under Order 32, Rule 12, read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, has been filed by applicants/respondents No. 2 & 3 for discharging their natural guardian, as they have attained the age of majority. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by the affidavits of both the applicants and also taking into consideration the fact that the applicants have now attained the age of majority, as is evident from their Birth Certificates, appended with the application as Annexure A-1 (colly), wherein date of birth of applicant/respondent No. 2 Sahil Sharma has been mentioned as 28.02.2006 and date of birth of applicant/respondent No. 3 Kirti Kumari has been mentioned as 05.10.2007, the present application is allowed

and

natural

guardianship of applicants/respondents No. 2 & 3 is ordered to be discharged and they are permitted to pursue the case in their own capacity. The application stands disposed of. CMP No. 24403/2026 The present application under Section 151 of CPC has been filed on behalf of applicants/respondents No. 2 & 3, for release of the award amount, alongwith up- to-date interest, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court. The application is duly supported by the affidavits of both the applicants. No reply to the application is intended to be filed and learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant has no objection in case the prayer made in the application is allowed, as no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court and the same has attained finality. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by the affidavits of both the applicants, coupled with the fact that till date, no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court and the same has attained finality, the same is allowed and the award amount, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court,

alongwith up-to-date interest, is ordered to be released in favour of applicants/respondents No. 2 & 3, as per their respective shares, after proper verification and identification, by remitting the same to their bank accounts, details whereof have been mentioned in para-4 of the application. The application stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 6th October, 2026 (raman)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead