Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./1936/2026 of SURENDER KUMAR AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 5 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1936 of 2026 Decided on: 05 th October, 2026 ____________________________________________________________________ Surender Kumar and another ....Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and others ...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:43078
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1936 of 2026 Decided on: 05
th October, 2026
____________________________________________________________________ Surender Kumar and another ....Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and others
...Respondents _____________________________________________________________________
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioners: Mr. Piyush Mehta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral)
Learned Deputy Advocate General has produced instructions dated 03.10.2026, issued by the Director, Directorate of School Education, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-1 and copy of office order dated 03.10.2026, passed by the Deputy Director School Education, (Elementary) Shimla, District Shimla (HP), which are taken on record.
2. A perusal of the aforesaid office order dated 03.10.2026 reveals that the representation of the petitioners is considered and they have been held to be similarly situated to 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
CWP No.2500/2021, titled as Ranjeet Singh & others vs. State of H.P.
3. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 30.07.2024, passed in CWP No.7345 of 2024, titled Sh. Surender Kumar and another vs. The State of Himachal Pradesh and others, has been complied with, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present execution petition and the same is accordingly closed. However, in case the financial benefits are not released in favour of the petitioners within twelve weeks from today as per the judgment passed in Ranjeet Singh’s case (supra), they shall be at liberty to take appropriate remedy in accordance with law.
4. The execution petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
th October, 2026
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (ankit) Judge