Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P/23/2016 of RAJ RAJEEV SOOD Vs BUDHI SINGH CHAUHAN on 5 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.23 of 2016 Date of Decision: 05.10.2026 _______________________________________________________ Sh. Rajeev Sood & Anr. …….Petitioners Versus Budhi Singh Chauhan … Respondent Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No.23 of 2016 Date of Decision: 05.10.2026 _______________________________________________________ Sh. Rajeev Sood & Anr.
…….Petitioners
Versus Budhi Singh Chauhan
… Respondent
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting? 1
For the Petitioners: Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Banta, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate (through Video Conferencing) & Mr. S. Partha Swami, Advocate. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):
Learned counsel representing the petitioner, on instructions of the petitioner, fairly states that decree stands fully satisfied and as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the same are closed. Needless to say, on account of execution of judgment/decree sought to be executed in the instant proceedings, entries made in the revenue record qua attachment of the property in the Civil Suit No. 114 of 2012 shall be removed and the property shall be released.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge October 05, 2026 (sunil)
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?