Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./1980/2026 of PRIYA Vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 5 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1980 of 2026 Decided on: 05 th October, 2026 ___________________________________________________________________ Priya ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others ...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:43073
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1980
of 2026
Decided on: 05
th October, 2026
___________________________________________________________________ Priya ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others
...Respondents _____________________________________________________________________
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Annieket Bhaik, Advocate vice Mr. Akhil Mehta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Hemant Kumar Verma, Deputy Advocate General. . Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral)
Learned Deputy Advocate General has produced instructions dated 03.10.2026, issued by the Director, Directorate of School Education, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-1 and copy of office order dated 13.07.2026, passed by the Deputy Director School Education, (Elementary) Una, District Una, H.P, which are taken on record.
2. A perusal of the aforesaid office order dated 13.07.2026 reveals that the petitioner has been allowed higher pay scale in the concerned level of pay matrix after 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
completion of two years of regular service, subject to the final outcome of LPA filed by the State in Mohit Sharma’s case. The DDO concerned has also been directed to fix the pay of the petitioner and release the arrears.
3. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 16.06.2026, passed in CWP No.8827 of 2026, titled, Priya vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, has duly been complied with, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present execution petition and the same is accordingly closed. However, in case the arrears are not released in favour of the petitioner within twelve weeks from today, she shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the present execution petition.
4. The execution petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
th October, 2026
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (ankit) Judge