Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/17413/2025 of M/S SINGAL POLYMER Vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 5 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.17413 of 2025 Decided on 05th October 2026 M/s Singal Polymer …Petitioner Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and another …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Hon’ble Mr. Justice Yogesh Jaswal, Judge
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No.17413 of 2025
Decided on 05th October 2026 M/s Singal Polymer
…Petitioner Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and another
…Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Hon’ble Mr. Justice Yogesh Jaswal, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Mr. Vishal Mohan, Senior
Advocate, with Mr. Shriyek
Sharda, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Sushant Keprate, Additional
Advocate General.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
By way of this this writ petition, the petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for the following reliefs:- “a) That this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of certiorari and quash the order dated 17.11.2022 registration of the petitioner has been cancelled by a non-speaking order.
b) That this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of certiorari and quash the order of Appellate Authority dated 23.06.2025 whereby without taking into consideration the date of communication or order, the appeal has been dismissing on account of barred by limitation.”
2
2. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that what necessitated the filing of the present petition, despite the availability of statutory appellate remedy, was that the learned Appellate Tribunal was not functional. He submits that, as now the learned Appellate Tribunal is now functional, the petitioner be granted some reasonable time to approach the learned Appellate Tribunal.
3. In light of the prayer made by learned Senior Counsel, this petition is disposed of with the direction that, in case the petitioner files an Appeal before the learned Appellate Tribunal within a period of 60 days from today, then, the same shall be construed to have been filed within the period of limitation and the same shall be decided on merit.
4. With these observations, the petition stands disposed of, so also pending miscellaneous applications, if any.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge
(Yogesh Jaswal)
Judge October 05, 2026 (Vinod)