Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./1984/2026 of PARDEEP KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 5 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1984 of 2026 Decided on: 05 th October, 2026 ___________________________________________________________________ Pardeep Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others ...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:43072
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1984
of 2026
Decided on: 05
th October, 2026
___________________________________________________________________ Pardeep Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others
...Respondents _____________________________________________________________________
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Rajesh Verma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General. . Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral)
Learned Deputy Advocate General has produced a copy of office order dated 03.10.2026, passed by the Deputy Director Elementary Education, Hamirpur, District Hamirpur (HP), which is taken on record.
2. A perusal of the same reveals that the petitioner has been found similar situated to the CWP No.4830 of 2023, titled as Inder Singh & others vs. State of H.P. and others and he has been held entitled for higher pay scale of Rs.40,100/- after two years of regular service, subject to final outcome of LPA being filed by the State in this Court. Due and admissible arrear (if any) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
has also been ordered to be released in favour of the petitioner. However, an undertaking to this effect shall be obtained from the petitioner that the overpayment if any, found, in later stage shall be recovered from him accordingly.
3. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 12.05.2026, passed in CWP No.6090 of 2026, titled, Pardeep Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, has duly been complied with, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present execution petition and the same is closed. However, in case, the arrears are not released in favour of the petitioner within twelve weeks from today, he shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the present execution petition.
4. The execution petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
th October, 2026
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (ankit) Judge