Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./1822/2026 of DEEPIKA SHARMA Vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 5 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Ex. Pet. No.1822 of 2026 Decided on: 5th October, 2026 Deepika Sharma ....Petitioner versus State of H.P. and others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:43183
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
Ex. Pet. No.1822 of 2026
Decided on: 5th October, 2026
Deepika Sharma
....Petitioner
versus
State of H.P. and others
...Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner: Mr. Ajay Kumar Lahota, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General.
Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral)
Learned Deputy Advocate General has produced instructions dated 03.10.2026 issued by the Director, Directorate of School Education, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla- 171001 along with office order dated 30.09.2026, which are taken on record.
2. A perusal of aforesaid office order reveals that the petitioner has been allowed higher pay scale after two years of regular service, subject to final outcome of LPA filed in CWP No.4830 of 2023 titled as Inder Singh and any other legal remedies. DDO concerned has been directed to fix the pay of the petitioner and release the arrears with the condition that 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2026:HHC:43183 2
in case the outcome of LPA is in favour of the Department, the petitioner is bound to refund the amount of arrears so paid to her.
3. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 14.05.2026 passed in CWP No.6484 of 2026, titled, Deepika Sharma Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others has been complied with, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present execution petition and the same is closed. However, in case the arrears are not released in favour of the petitioner as per the mandate contained in the judgment sought to be executed within twelve weeks from today, she shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the execution petition.
4. The execution petition is accordingly disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any.
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) 5th October, 2026
Judge (naveen)