Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./1967/2026 of POONAM Vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 5 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1967 of 2026 Decided on: 05 th October, 2026 ___________________________________________________________________ Poonam ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others ...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:43077
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1967
of 2026
Decided on: 05
th October, 2026
___________________________________________________________________ Poonam ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others
...Respondents _____________________________________________________________________
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Rajesh Verma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Hemant Kumar Verma, Deputy Advocate General. . Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral)
Learned Deputy Advocate General has produced instructions issued by the Director of School Education, Himachal Pradesh and copy of office order dated 29.09.2026, passed by the Deputy Director of School Education (Elementary), Mandi, District Mandi (H.P.), which are taken on record.
2. A perusal of the aforesaid order dated 29.09.2026 reveals that the petitioner has been allowed higher pay stage of Rs.37,600/- after two years of regular services subject to final outcome of LPA filed in CWP No.4830 of 2023, titled as Inder Singh and any other Legal remedies. The DDO concerned has 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
also been directed to fix the pay of the petitioner and release the arrears with the condition that in case the decision of the LPA comes in favour of the Department, the petitioner shall be bound to refund the amount of arrears so paid to her and an undertaking to this effect shall be obtained from the petitioner that the overpayment if any, found, in later stage shall be recovered from her accordingly.
3. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 12.05.2026, passed in CWP No.6089 of 2026, titled, Poonam vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, has duly been complied with, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present execution petition and the same is closed. However, in case, the arrears are not released in favour of the petitioner within twelve weeks from today, she shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the present execution petition.
4. The execution petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
th October, 2026
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (ankit) Judge