Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./2398/2026 of SANJAY KUMAR Vs STATE OF HP AND ORS on 1 October 2026
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.2398 of 2026 Date of Decision: 1.10.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Sanjay Kumar and Ors. ……...Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. …....Respondents Coram
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No.2398 of 2026
Date of Decision: 1.10.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Sanjay Kumar and Ors. ……...Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.
…....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioners: Mr. Hirdaya Ram, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. ___________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
By way of present execution petition, prayer has been made by the petitioners for implementation and execution of order/judgment dated 5.12.2025, passed by this Court in CWP No.19141 of 2025, titled as Sanjay Kumar and Ors. v. State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors., whereby afore petition came to be disposed of with a direction to respondent/competent authority to consider and decide representation of the petitioners in light of judgment passed in CWP No. 2004 of 2017, titled as Taj Mohammad v. State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors, within six weeks. Since no action, whatsoever, came to be taken at the behest of the respondents pursuant to
2 aforesaid direction, petitioners have approached this Court in the instant proceedings.
2. Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General fairly states that in terms of undertaking given before the Hon'ble Apex Court, benefits flowing from afore said judgment shall be released to the petitioner within a period of four months.
2. Consequently, in view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and as such, present petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents to do the needful within four months, failing which petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken towards implementation of the order/judgment.
October 01, 2026
(Sandeep Sharma), (manjit)
Judge