Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/636/2018 of SANJAY KUMAR Vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 1 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.636 of 2018 Date of Decision: 01.10.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Sanjay Kumar ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.636 of 2018
Date of Decision: 01.10.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Sanjay Kumar
……...Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.
…....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Ms. Heena Chauhan, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for respondents No.1 to 4.
Mr. Diwan Singh Negi, Advocate, for respondent No.5. ___________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel representing the petitioner states that despite repeated communications, petitioner is not coming forward to impart instructions. She further states that as per the information made available to her by the respondent-State, FIR No. 112/2017, dated 11.09.2017, under Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, registered at Police Station BSL Colony, Sundernagar, District Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, against respondent No. 5, Gulzari Lal, has already been quashed on the basis of compromise.
2
2. Having taken note of the aforesaid statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, coupled with the fact that the aforesaid FIR already stands quashed, this Court is of the view that petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing the case further and accordingly, the same is dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(Sandeep Sharma )
Judge October 01, 2026
(sunil)