Himachal Pradesh High Court
CMP-T/663/2025 of PARAS RAM Vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 1 October 2026
Versus STATE OF HP AND OTHERS CMP-T-663 of 2025 in EX.PT - 354 of 2020 01.10.2026 Present: Mr. Subhash Mohan Snehi & Ms. Niranjana, Advocates, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
PARAS RAM Versus STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
CMP-T-663 of 2025
in EX.PT - 354 of 2020
01.10.2026 Present: Mr. Subhash Mohan Snehi & Ms. Niranjana, Advocates, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondents-State.
While placing on record communication dated 30.09.2026, issued under the signature of Executive Engineer, Mandi, Division No.1, HPPWD at Padhar, enclosing therewith copy of order dated 24.11.2025 passed by the afore authority, Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, states that in compliance to directions contained in judgment sought to be executed, claim of the petitioner for granting him work charge status retrospectively w.e.f 01.01.2002 has been accepted and his pay has been refixed vide order dated 24.11.2025. Pension case of the petitioner has also been sent to the office of Accountant General, which also stands sanctioned vide order dated 24.02.2026. Afore Communication further reveals that pension arrears also stand released in favour of the petitioner.
Having carefully perused aforesaid documents, which are taken on record, vis-a-vis mandate contained in the judgment sought to be executed, this Court finds that directions contained in judgment stand complied with and as such,
nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the same are closed with a direction to the respondents to ensure consequential benefits, if not already released, shall be released to the petitioner expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from today.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge
October 01, 2026
(Sunil)