Himachal Pradesh High Court

COPC/1563/2026 of BABINDER SINGH Vs ANJU SHARMA AND ANOTHER on 1 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.1563 of 2026 Date of decision: 01.10.2026 Babinder Singh ….Petitioner Versus Er. Anju Sharma & Anr. ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

. ( 2026:HHC:42533 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.1563 of 2026 Date of decision: 01.10.2026 Babinder Singh ….Petitioner Versus Er. Anju Sharma & Anr. ….Respondents

Coram:

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): Learned counsel for the petitioner, states that he doesn’t want to press the present petition, at this stage.

2. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed, as not pressed.

( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge October 01, 2026

(reena) 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement?

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead