Himachal Pradesh High Court
CMP-T/38/2026 of VIJAY SINGH AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 1 October 2026
AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HP AND OTHERS CMP-T-38 of 2026 in EX.PT - 282 of 2024 01.10.2026 Present: Ms. Rashmi Parmar, Advocate, for the applicants/petitioners. Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
VIJAY SINGH AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
CMP-T-38 of 2026
in EX.PT - 282 of 2024
01.10.2026 Present: Ms. Rashmi Parmar, Advocate, for the applicants/petitioners.
Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for non- applicants/ respondents No.1 & 2-State.
Ms. Vanshika Bagga, Advocate, for the non- applicant/respondent No.3.
While placing on record communication dated 08.09.2026, issued under the signature of the Director of School Education, Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, states that the Deputy Director of School Education (Elementary) has been directed to release interest at the rate of 9% and has been allotted a sum of Rs. 12,32,069/-. He further states that remaining amount of Rs. 27,53,570/- has been allotted to the Deputy Director of School Education (Secondary), Shimla, for the financial year 2026-27, for further disbursement to the petitioner.
Having taken note of aforesaid communication, which is taken on record, this Court sees no reason to keep the petition alive and accordingly, the same is disposed of with a direction to the Deputy Director of School Education to ensure that interest on delayed payment of grant-in-aid, which remains to be paid, is paid expeditiously, preferably within a period of 10 days, failing which petitioner shall be at liberty to seek revival of
the present proceedings, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law, is taken for implementation of the judgment/order sought to be executed in the instant proceedings.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge
October 01, 2026
(Sunil)