Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/4327/2026 of NEERA DEVI Vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 30 September 2026
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.4327 of 2026 Date of Decision: 30.9.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Neera Devi Sharma ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.4327 of 2026
Date of Decision: 30.9.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Neera Devi Sharma ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. …....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioner: Mr. Nishant Khidtta, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the State.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3. __________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
While placing on record communication dated 26.09.2026 issued under the signature of Director of School Education, enclosing therewith copy of office order dated 11.09.2026 issued by the aforesaid authority, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that petitioner as well as respondent No. 3 have been retained at their respective places of posting, i.e. Government Senior Secondary School Nihalgarh, District Sirmaur and Government Senior Secondary School Wasni, District Sirmaur, respectively, as a result thereof, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings.
2
2. Having carefully perused order dated 26.09.2026, this Court finds that nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and the same is accordingly disposed of along with pending applications, if any.
September 30, 2026
(Sandeep Sharma), (manjit)
Judge