Himachal Pradesh High Court
OMPM/221/2024 of NATIONAL HIGH WAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA Vs BHAGAT RAM on 30 September 2026
Ram OMP (M) No. 221/2024 30.09.2026 Present: Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, vice counsel for the appellant. Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate, for respondents No. 1(i) and 1(iii). Mr. Yug Singhal, Advocate, for respondent No. 1(ii). OMP (M) No. 221/2024 The present application has been filed for
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
NHAI vs. Bhagat Ram
OMP (M) No. 221/2024
30.09.2026 Present: Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, vice counsel for the appellant.
Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate, for respondents No. 1(i) and 1(iii).
Mr. Yug Singhal, Advocate, for respondent No.
1(ii).
OMP (M) No. 221/2024
The present application has been filed for condonation of delay in filing the main appeal. It has been averred in the application that even though copy of the impugned judgment, dated 27.12.2023 was applied by the counsel on 16.01.2024 and completed on 15.02.2024, however disposal of the case was not within the knowledge of the applicant as the same was never intimated to the applicant by its counsel/Law Firm i.e. M/s M.V. Kini & Co. Due to such inefficiency and lackadaisical attitude of the aforesaid Law Firm, cases were withdrawn from it vide letter dated 20.9.2023 and allotted to M/s Nishank Mattoo & Associates. On closing of the financial year, when the applicant inquired from all the Law Firms about pendency of all the cases pending in various Forums, it came to the knowledge of the applicant that objection petitions pertaining to Muhal Bhated have already been disposed of. Accordingly prompt action was taken for preparation of the appeal. Thus, the aforesaid delay is neither intentional nor deliberate, but has occurred due to unavoidable circumstances, which were beyond the control of the applicant.
Learned counsels for the non-applicants have no objection for the instant application being allowed.
For the reasons stated in the application, more particularly, paras 3 to 5 thereof, which is duly supported by an affidavit, coupled with submissions made by the learned vice counsel for the applicant, delay in filing the main appeal is condoned.
Appeal be registered. Application stands disposed of.
Arb. Appeal No. /2026
Heard. Admit. Send for the records. List in due course. OMP No. /2026
Be registered. Heard. Subject to the applicant’s depositing entire awarded amount along with upto date interest in the Registry of this Court within a period of eight weeks from today, operation, implementation and execution of the impugned judgment as also the impugned arbitral award, shall remain stayed during the pendency of the appeal. Application stands disposed of.
OMP No. 1057/2026
The applicant is exempted from filing English translation of Annexure A-1 at this stage subject to filing of the same within seven days as and when directed to do so. The application stands disposed of.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge 30.09.2026 (pankaj)