Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./1387/2026 of RAMESH SINGH Vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 29 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1387 of 2026 Decided on: 29.09.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Ramesh Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1387 of 2026 Decided on: 29.09.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Ramesh Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner : Mr. Dixit Sahotra, Advocate vice Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Advocate, For the respondents: Mr. Rupinder Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. Dikken Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
, Judge
(Oral)
Learned Additional Advocate General has produced instructions dated 26.09.2026 and office order dated 25.09.2026 passed by the Executive Engineer, Flood Protection Division, Gagret, Distt. Una, H.P., which are taken on record.
2. A perusal of the aforesaid office order dated 25.09.2026 reveals that the case of the petitioner is not similarly situated to Balo Devi’s case and hence considered
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
and rejected.
3. This Court while disposing of the writ petition preferred by the petitioner has only given direction to the respondents to consider and decide the case of the petitioner in terms of the decision passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal No.4792 of 2022 (arising out of SLP (Civil) No.18830 of 2021), titled, Balo Devi vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors., in a time bound manner.
4. Since the competent authority has now passed an office order dated 25.09.2026, thereby considering the claim of the petitioner and having not found similarly situated to Balo Devi’s case, the mandate contained in the judgment dated 06.01.2026, passed in CWP No.383 of 2026, titled, Ramesh Singh vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors., has duly been complied with and the petition is disposed of as having been fully satisfied. However, the petitioner, if aggrieved by the office order dated 25.09.2026, may take appropriate remedy in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
th September
, 2026
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (Anurag) Judge