Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./1618/2026 of REENA DEVI Vs Himachal Road Transport Corporation on 29 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1618 of 2026 Decided on: 29.09.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Reena Devi and others ...Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another ...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1618 of 2026 Decided on: 29.09.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Reena Devi and others
...Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another
...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. P. D. Nanda, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
, Judge
(Oral)
Learned counsel representing the respondents has produced instructions dated 28.09.2026, issued by the Executive Director, Himachal Road Transport Corporation, Shimla-171003, which are taken on record.
2. A perusal of the aforesaid instructions reveals that the pension arrears of Rs.2,75,164/- have been paid to the petitioner on 07.07.2026 and further the petitioner is being paid pension w.e.f. June, 2026. Back date regularization arrear of first installment and second installment amounting to Rs. 1,02,621/- and Rs.1,14,023/-, respectively, has also been paid to the petitioner.
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
3. This Court while disposing of the writ petition preferred by the petitioner on 14.05.2025 had given direction to the respondents to consider and decide the case of the petitioner in light of the judgment passed in CWPOA No.2343 of 2020, titled, Vikram Singh vs. Himachal Road Transport Corporation and connected matters, in a time bound manner.
4. Since the respondents have now started paying the pension to the petitioner and further the pension arrear amounting to Rs.2,75,164/- and the arrears on account of first installment and second installment have also been released in favour of the petitioner, the mandate contained in the judgment sought to be executed has been complied with, as such nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present execution petition and the same is closed. However, the respondents are directed that the petitioner shall be paid the arrears strictly as per the judgment in Vikram Singh’s case (supra) and the installments being paid to other employees. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
th September
, 2026
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (Anurag) Judge