Himachal Pradesh High Court
CMP.M/1095/2026 of AMAR SHARMA Vs AJUDHIYA LAL on 29 September 2026
vs. Ajudhiya Lal CMP(M) No. 1095 of 2026 29.09.2026 Present: Mr. Vijender Katoch, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Piyush Agnihotri, Advocate, for the respondent. CMP(M) No. 1095 of 2026 The instant application has been filed for condonation of delay in filing the present appeal, which is barred
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Amar Sharma vs. Ajudhiya Lal CMP(M) No. 1095 of 2026 29.09.2026 Present: Mr. Vijender Katoch, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Piyush Agnihotri, Advocate, for the respondent. CMP(M) No. 1095 of 2026 The instant application has been filed for condonation of delay in filing the present appeal, which is barred by 17 days. The said application has not been opposed by the learned counsel for the non-applicant. In view of the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, and in view of no objection on behalf of the learned counsel for the non- applicants, the same is allowed and the delay of 17 days, which has occurred in filing the appeal is condoned. Application stands disposed of. RSA No. ______2026 (RAST No. 28554 of 2026)
Appeal be registered. List for admission after two weeks. In the meantime, record be requisitioned.
CMP(M) No. _______2026 CMPST No. 28556 of 2026 Application be registered. It is contended by the learned counsel for the respondent that he intends to file reply to the stay application. On his request, list the matter after two weeks.
(Romesh Verma) Judge September 29, 2026 (Nisha)