Himachal Pradesh High Court
CRMP/4196/2026 of RAM PRAKASH Vs BHAGAT RAM AND ANOTHER on 29 September 2026
Vs. Bhagat Ram & anr. Cr. Revision No. 233 of 2026 29.9.2026 Present: Mr. Jagan Nath, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Suman Kumari, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.2. Cr. MP No. 4196 of 2026 Present application has been filed for
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Ram Prakash Vs. Bhagat Ram & anr. Cr. Revision No. 233 of 2026 29.9.2026 Present: Mr. Jagan Nath, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Suman Kumari, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.2. Cr. MP No. 4196 of 2026 Present application has been filed for modification of the judgment dated 15.5.2026, in which it has been asserted that in para-5 of the judgment, amount of ₹30,000/- is stated to have been deposited in the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Bilaspur, H.P., whereas, the same is deposited in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bilaspur, H.P. Learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner submitted that the amount has been deposited in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bilaspur, H.P. Since the error is purely clerical and is required to be rectified. Hence, the present application is allowed and the words mentioned in para-5 of the judgment “learned Sessions Judge, Bilaspur, H.P.” be corrected and substituted as “learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bilaspur, H.P.” Necessary correction be made accordingly. Application stands disposed of. (Rakesh Kainthla)
Judge
29th September, 2026 (Chander)