Himachal Pradesh High Court
COPC/1309/2026 of DEEPIKA DEVI Vs M. SUDHA DEVI AND OTHERS on 29 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.1309 of 2026 Date of Decision: 29.09.2026 ___________________________________________________ Deepika Devi ....Petitioner Versus Ms. Sudha Devi & ors. …Respondents ___________________________________________________ Coram
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1 2026:HHC:41986 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.1309 of 2026 Date of Decision: 29.09.2026 ___________________________________________________ Deepika Devi ....Petitioner Versus Ms. Sudha Devi & ors. …Respondents ___________________________________________________
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. Himanshu Kapila, Advocate, vice Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 28.09.2026, wherein it has been stated that the representation of the petitioner has been kept pending by the respondent-Department till the final outcome/decision in LPA No.295 of 2026 or till finality of the 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 2026:HHC:41986 judgment dated 21.03.2024, passed by the Court in all the cases.
2. Therefore, in view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and, accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. Notice discharged.
3. However, the petitioner is at liberty to revive the present contempt petition, if occasion arises to do so. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) September 29, 2026 Judge (V. Himalvi)