Himachal Pradesh High Court

CMPMO/680/2024 of SANJEEV KUMAR Vs THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR HORTICULTURE on 29 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CMPMO No. 680/2024 Decided on: 29.09.2026 Sanjeev Kumar …..Petitioner Versus The Deputy Director, Horticulture, Hamirpur ….Respondent ______________________________________________________________ Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

2026:HHC:42485

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA

CMPMO No. 680/2024

Decided on: 29.09.2026

Sanjeev Kumar

…..Petitioner

Versus

The Deputy Director, Horticulture, Hamirpur ….Respondent ______________________________________________________________

Coram:

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Shekhar Badola, Advocate.

For the Respondents: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Addl.

Advocate General.

Romesh Verma, Judge (oral)

Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case he is permitted to file comprehensive representation, highlighting therein his grievances, to the respondent-authority within a period of four weeks from today with a direction to decide the same within four weeks thereafter. His statement is taken on record.

1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

Without adjudicating anything on merits of the case, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction that in the event of filing aforesaid representation by the petitioner to the respondent-authority within a period of four weeks from today, the respondent-authority shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law, positively within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of such representation, after affording personal hearing to the petitioner. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

(Romesh Verma) 29.09.2026

Judge (pankaj)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead