Himachal Pradesh High Court
CMP/9907/2026 of RAM KRISHAN Vs HPTDC AND OTHERS on 29 September 2026
Versus HPTDC AND OTHERS CMP-9907 of 2026 in EX.P. - 695 of 2025 29.09.2026 Present: Mr. Himanshu Kapila, Senior Advocate vice Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Harmender Singh, Advocate, for the respondent. Learned counsel representing the petitioner fairly states that
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
RAM KRISHAN Versus HPTDC AND OTHERS
CMP-9907 of 2026 in
EX.P. - 695 of 2025 29.09.2026 Present: Mr. Himanshu Kapila, Senior Advocate vice Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Harmender Singh, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel representing the petitioner fairly states that in terms of the judgment sought to be executed, consequential benefits stand granted to the petitioner, save and except arrears on account of the revised pay scale, which issue is pending adjudication before the learned Single Judge in a case titled Tulsi Ram Vs. HPTDC.
In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and, accordingly, the same are closed at this stage, reserving liberty to the petitioner to get the present petition revived after disposal of Tulsi Ram’s case, if required and desired.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge
September 29, 2026
(Sunil)