Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./1340/2026 of HUKAM CHAND Vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 28 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1340 of 2026 Decided on: 28.09.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Hukam Chand ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1340 of 2026 Decided on: 28.09.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Hukam Chand
...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others
...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Virender Singh, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Hemant Kumar Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
, Judge
(Oral)
The respondents have filed reply to the execution petition and placed on record the office order dated 27.07.2026 (Annexure R-II).
2. A perusal of the office order reveals that after passing the judgment by this Court, a speaking order was passed and thereafter the pay of the petitioner has been re- fixed after grant of work charge status w.e.f. 01.01.2003 on notional basis.
3. This Court while disposing of the writ petition preferred by the petitioner on 26.06.2025 had given
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
direction to the respondents to consider and decide the case of the petitioner in light of the judgment passed by Hon’ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal No.1595 of 2025, titled, State of Himachal Pradesh and others vs. Surajmani and others.
4. Since the respondents have now passed the office order dated 27.07.2026 thereby granting the work charge status to the petitioner w.e.f. 01.01.2003 and his pay has been refixed, the mandate contained in the judgment dated 26.06.2025 passed in CWP No.10213 of 2025, titled, Hukum Chand vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors., has been complied with and as such nothing remains to be adjudication in the present execution petition and the same is disposed of as having been satisfied. However, it is made clear that in case the arrears are not released in favour of the petitioner, within eight weeks from today, in terms of the directions given by this Court in the judgment sought to be executed, he shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the execution petition. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
th September
, 2026
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (Anurag) Judge