Himachal Pradesh High Court
COPC/1495/2026 of SUSHEEL KUMAR Vs RAKESH KANWAR AND ANOTHER on 28 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.1495 of 2026 Date of decision:28.09.2026 Susheel Kumar ...Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & another ...Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Bhupinder
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No.1495 of 2026
Date of decision:28.09.2026
Susheel Kumar
...Petitioner
Versus Rakesh Kanwar & another
...Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General.
Romesh Verma, Judge (oral):
The instant petition has been filed alleging non- compliance of the judgment passed in CWP No. 6755 of 2026, dated 06.05.2026.
2. This Court had directed the State on 25.09.2026 to obtain current instructions in the matter. Today, Mr. Manish Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General, has placed on record a copy of office order dated 26.09.2026, whereby, after considering the case of the petitioner, the same has been ordered to be rejected.
3. Faced with this situation, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to assail the said office order before the competent Court of law.
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
-2-
4. Since the judgment as passed by this Court stands fully complied with, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the contempt proceedings, save and except granting liberty as aforesaid.
5. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed for, along with pending application(s), if any.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge 28th September, 2026
(vt)