Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./2272/2026 of KRISHAN LAL Vs THE HPSEBL AND OTHERS on 28 September 2026
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 2272 of 2026 Date of Decision: 28.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Krishan Lal …….Petitioners Versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Limited & others … Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No. 2272 of 2026 Date of Decision: 28.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Krishan Lal
…….Petitioners
Versus
Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Limited & others
… Respondents ______________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Ravinder Thakur, Advocate. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):
Before notice, if any, could be issued in the instant proceedings, Mr. Ravinder Thakur, learned counsel representing the respondents has placed on record affidavit of compliance to state that the mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, stands duly complied with.
2. Careful perusal of aforesaid affidavit clearly reveals that Co-ordinate Bench of this Court had issued direction to the respondents to consider and decide the case of the petitioner in light of judgment passed in CWP No. No.8184 of 2022, titled Yashwant Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others¸ but since judgment rendered by this Court in afore case, has been stayed in LPA No.205 of 2025, titled as Chuni Lal VS. State of Himachal Pradesh & others alongwith connected matters, respondents have 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 already rejected the representation of the petitioner. Since there was only direction to consider the representation of the petitioner in light of judgment passed in Yashwant Kumar’s case(supra), coupled with the fact that judgment passed in Yashwant Kumar’s case(supra) has been already stayed by the Division Bench of this Court in LPA, as detailed hereinabove, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, same is disposed of.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge September 28, 2026 (shankar)