Himachal Pradesh High Court
COPC/1502/2026 of RAJINDER KUMAR Vs DEVESH KUMAR AND OTHERS on 28 September 2026
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC No. 1502 of 2026 Date of decision: 28.09.2026 Rajinder Kumar ...Petitioner. Versus Sh. Devesh Kumar & others ...Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Mamta Garg,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC No. 1502 of 2026 Date of decision: 28.09.2026 Rajinder Kumar
...Petitioner. Versus Sh. Devesh Kumar & others
...Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. Romesh Verma, Judge (Oral): The instant petition has been filed alleging non-compliance of the judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. 6219 of 2026, dated 13th May, 2026.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is seeking parity in terms of the judgment passed in CWP No. 2056 of 2023, titled Ghanshyam Dass vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & others, decided on 21.03.2024.
3. Today, learned Deputy Advocate General has placed on record the copy of the order dated 17.08.2026 as passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench in LPA No. 295 of 2026, titled State of Himachal Pradesh & others vs. Ghanshyam Dass & others, whereby the order as passed in CWP No. 2056 of 2023 has been ordered to be stayed.
4. Consequently, the present petition is ordered to be closed with liberty reserved to the petitioner that in case the grievances of the petitioner still remain unredressed, after the disposal of the letters patent appeal, the petitioner shall be at liberty to revive the instant petition.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge September 28, 2026 (Nisha) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?