Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/14824/2025 of RADHA DEVI Vs THE DC CHAMBA AND OTHERS on 28 September 2026
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.14824 of 2025 Date of Decision: 28.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Smt. Radha Devi …….Petitioners Versus Deputy Commissioner, Chamba & others … Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.14824 of 2025 Date of Decision: 28.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Smt. Radha Devi
…….Petitioners
Versus
Deputy Commissioner, Chamba & others … Respondents _______________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondent- State.
Ms. Ranjana, Advocate vice Ms. Suman Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant in CMP No. 27854 of 2025.
____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):
While placing on record copy of order dated 25.09.2026 passed by Deputy Commissioner, Chamba, District Chamba, Himachal Pradesh, learned counsel representing the petitioner fairly states that on account of subsequent development, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and as such, this Court may pass appropriate orders.
1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
2. Having perused aforesaid order, which is taken on record, this Court finds that petitioner herein has been exonerated qua the allegations levelled against her that she failed to complete the work of laying tiles within stipulated time, as a consequence of which, suspension of the petitioner has been revoked.
3. In view of the above, relief, otherwise prayed for in the instant petition, stands granted to the petitioner and as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, same is disposed of. However, before parting, this Court wishes to observe that funds, if any, required for completion of the work shall also be released, enabling petitioner to the needful in terms of order dated 25.09.2026 within stipulated time. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge September 28,2026 (shankar)