Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./1730/2026 of KALI DASS Vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 28 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1730 of 2026 Decided on: 28.09.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Kali Dass ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another ...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1730 of 2026 Decided on: 28.09.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Kali Dass
...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Balwant Singh Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Hemant Kumar Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
, Judge
(Oral)
Learned Deputy Advocate General has produced instructions dated 26.09.2026, issued by the Director, Directorate of School Education, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla- 1 and copy of office order dated 10.09.2026, passed by the Deputy Director of School Education (Elementary), Mandi, District Mandi (HP), which are taken on record.
2. A perusal of the aforesaid office order dated 10.09.2026 reveals that the representation of the petitioner has been considered and decided.
3. Since this Court had only given direction to the
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
respondents to consider and decide the pending representation submitted by the petitioner, in terms of the decision passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.3280 of 2022, titled, Surinder Kumar and others vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and another along with connected matters, the mandate contained in the judgment has duly been complied with and as such nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present execution petition. However, the petitioner, if aggrieved, may take appropriate remedy against the office order dated 10.09.2026, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
th September
, 2026
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (Anurag) Judge